<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEO Website vs. Multimedia Website</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.seoreligion.com/seo-website-vs-multimedia-website.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.seoreligion.com/seo-website-vs-multimedia-website.html</link>
	<description>Probably not new to some of you</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 20:13:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eydryan</title>
		<link>http://news.seoreligion.com/seo-website-vs-multimedia-website.html#comment-14995</link>
		<dc:creator>eydryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 22:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.ituloy-angsulong.info/seo-website-vs-multimedia-website.html#comment-14995</guid>
		<description>interesting post. I&#039;ve even made a lengthy blog post about this stuff and if you want to just visit my site and see it, i think it&#039;s an interesting view on the whole seo vs flash thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting post. I&#8217;ve even made a lengthy blog post about this stuff and if you want to just visit my site and see it, i think it&#8217;s an interesting view on the whole seo vs flash thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: action online &#187; I&#8217;m a Mac, and I&#8217;m a PC&#8230; and I&#8217;m Linux!</title>
		<link>http://news.seoreligion.com/seo-website-vs-multimedia-website.html#comment-5348</link>
		<dc:creator>action online &#187; I&#8217;m a Mac, and I&#8217;m a PC&#8230; and I&#8217;m Linux!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 13:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.ituloy-angsulong.info/seo-website-vs-multimedia-website.html#comment-5348</guid>
		<description>[...] started copying the same format of commercials. There is an SEO one too, where it&#8217;s I&#8217;m a multimedia website and I&#8217;m an SEO website. Below are some I&#8217;m a Mac, I&#8217;m a PC&#8230; and I&#8217;m Linux videos I found [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] started copying the same format of commercials. There is an SEO one too, where it&#8217;s I&#8217;m a multimedia website and I&#8217;m an SEO website. Below are some I&#8217;m a Mac, I&#8217;m a PC&#8230; and I&#8217;m Linux videos I found [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ituloy AngSulong</title>
		<link>http://news.seoreligion.com/seo-website-vs-multimedia-website.html#comment-4276</link>
		<dc:creator>Ituloy AngSulong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.ituloy-angsulong.info/seo-website-vs-multimedia-website.html#comment-4276</guid>
		<description>I agree with you Adrian

- Benj Arriola</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you Adrian</p>
<p>- Benj Arriola</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://news.seoreligion.com/seo-website-vs-multimedia-website.html#comment-4270</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 12:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.ituloy-angsulong.info/seo-website-vs-multimedia-website.html#comment-4270</guid>
		<description>God that&#039;s fucking lame.
Saw the first one, where the implication is that if you use SEO, you get loads of &#039;hit&#039;s, but no one hangs around.

Er, no, that&#039;s not what SEO is.  That&#039;s what bad SEO is.  

Yes SEO is about getting traffic to your site, but good SEO is about getting useful traffic to your site, and &#039;converting&#039; that traffic into buyers/users, whatever your conversion point may be.

So, um, yeah, the entire premise of that video is even more inaccurate than the Apple ads.  Which I didn&#039;t think was that possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God that&#8217;s fucking lame.<br />
Saw the first one, where the implication is that if you use SEO, you get loads of &#8216;hit&#8217;s, but no one hangs around.</p>
<p>Er, no, that&#8217;s not what SEO is.  That&#8217;s what bad SEO is.  </p>
<p>Yes SEO is about getting traffic to your site, but good SEO is about getting useful traffic to your site, and &#8216;converting&#8217; that traffic into buyers/users, whatever your conversion point may be.</p>
<p>So, um, yeah, the entire premise of that video is even more inaccurate than the Apple ads.  Which I didn&#8217;t think was that possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
